Certificate validation
Compares certificate documents with application records. Specialists review missing fields and inconsistencies with source references before preparing the review report.
Inside the application
Selected use cases, source information and operational outputs.
Certificate PDFs, form data and supporting documents share a review context. Specialists compare relevant fields without losing their source relationships.
Certificate specialist assessment
Missing fields, inconsistent dates and document relationships become review findings, assessed together with supporting source information.
Compared record
Expert assessment
Certificate specialist assessment
Reviewers assess findings and ask questions in the certificate context. Results connect to review reports and structured exports.
Certificate specialist assessment
Application approach
The scope, operating approach and boundaries of this work.
PRUVA Form API records, certificate PDFs and extracted text are reviewed together. Field matching, missing information and internal consistency are handled as separate checks.
Reviewers see discrepancies alongside their source fields, ask questions in the certificate context and assess findings as they emerge.
Files can be processed in batches through the API or step by step in the interface. Results become HTML and PDF reports, with structured exports for findings.
In everyday work
Reading a certificate field is not enough. A reviewer needs to determine whether the document, source system and supporting material describe the same facts.
The original document, source record and specialist review.
The document and source system contain different dates. The current version needs verification.
Field matching is not a certification compliance decision.
The certificate PDF, supporting documents and PRUVA source record connect to the same review. The organization, ID and dates shown are fictional; no real certificate or customer data is used.
Extracted and source-system values appear side by side. Missing, different or interpretation-dependent fields go to review. Matching one field does not establish automatic compliance for the whole document.
Findings, evidence and specialist comments stay together. Reviewed results can be delivered as structured data and HTML/PDF reports. Batch API processing does not replace specialist decision authority.
The whole operation
These distinctions show the information the application receives, where it needs the user and what it leaves for the next operation.
These are evaluation dimensions, not measured performance results. Comparisons use the same task types, data scope and human-review conditions.
Related work
Interface conceptInitial working releaseCertificate data and relationships
Connects certificates, organizations, products and shipments in a shared data environment. Combines document storage, relationship views, search and review.
Explore the application
Interface conceptPlanningCertificate lifecycle
Planned certificate lifecycle tracking. Connects scope and validity to supplier requirements, document requests and renewal work.
Explore the application
Interface conceptPlanningAudit preparation
Planned support for audit preparation. Links requirements to document evidence and routes reviewed findings into corrective tasks and audit records.
Explore the applicationWork with us
Let’s assess your operations, data landscape and priorities together.
