Interface conceptResearch areaImage and video review
Kanıt
Research into visual evidence for expert review. Connects event candidates to source footage, timestamps, surrounding context and reviewer decisions.
Explore the applicationSite safety
Siper
Planned site-safety event review using camera footage and defined area policies. Human judgment and privacy are part of the design; the work remains pre-pilot.
- Information foundation
- Camera streams, zone and equipment policies
- Operational outcome
- Alert candidates and site incident records
- Human responsibility
- Site supervisor event decision
Inside the application
Application workflow
Selected use cases, source information and operational outputs.
Site-specific rules
The initial scope covers limited event types such as helmets, vests and hazardous zones.
SiperScenario / 01
Interface conceptResearch / conceptual
Site rule scope
Zone boundary
Work area
PPE ruleDefined for the site.
Review point
Decision boundary
Site supervisor event decision
- Camera streams, zone and equipment policies
OutputAlert candidates and site incident records
Review with evidence
Combining repeated detections and marking false alarms are planned.
SiperScenario / 02
Interface conceptResearch / conceptual
Event assessment
Initial assessment
Event candidate
Time and source
Decision
Governed continuation
Authorized review
Decision record
Decision boundary
Site supervisor event decision
- Camera streams, zone and equipment policies
OutputAlert candidates and site incident records
Events without personal identification
The plan prioritizes face blurring and avoids identifying people.
SiperScenario / 03
Interface conceptResearch / conceptual
Review without identification
Face obscuring
Camera source
Event contextEvent records, not identity inference.
Access boundaryImage access and processing permissions are separate.
Decision boundary
Site supervisor event decision
- Camera streams, zone and equipment policies
OutputAlert candidates and site incident records
Application approach
Scope and operating approach.
The scope, operating approach and boundaries of this work.
01Site-specific rules
The initial scope covers limited event types such as helmets, vests and hazardous zones. Camera zones and shift policies provide context.
02Review with evidence
Combining repeated detections and marking false alarms are planned. Site staff assess events; official and disciplinary decisions remain human responsibilities.
03Events without personal identification
The plan prioritizes face blurring and avoids identifying people. The work is pre-pilot; scope needs testing against camera conditions and site requirements.
Research scope: application behavior and business outcomes require pilot validation.
In everyday work
Site-specific rules, evidence-based decisions
Camera detections cannot be interpreted independently of site rules. Siper places zones, shifts and protective-equipment policies in the context of event review.
Site safety
Fictional sample dataSite-specific rules, evidence-based decisions
01Zone policy
Camera streams, zone and equipment policies
Example ruleZone and protective equipment
PrivacyNo personal identification
DecisionWith the site supervisor
02Event review
00:12Before
00:16Candidate
00:20After
PrivacyNo personal identification
Original sourceCamera streams, zone and equipment policies
A time-window diagram, not real camera footage.
03Site follow-up
Illustrative review stateSite supervisor event decision
Merging repeated candidates and flagging false alarms are planned. The site supervisor reviews footage alongside the applicable rule.
OutputAlert candidates and site incident records
Zone policy
Site-specific rules
This component shows incoming information together with its identity and provenance. Existing cameras and a limited event set are considered for the pilot. Helmet, vest or restricted-zone rules are defined for the relevant site conditions.
Event review
Review with evidence
This component explains how records are reviewed rather than displaying a result in isolation. Merging repeated candidates and flagging false alarms are planned. The site supervisor reviews footage alongside the applicable rule.
Site follow-up
Events without personal identification
This component distinguishes the user’s decision from the next work record. An event record is not automatic personnel scoring or a disciplinary decision. The plan prioritizes face blurring and no identity recognition; scope needs validation under real camera conditions.
The whole operation
Information, decisions and outcomes stay connected.
These distinctions show the information the application receives, where it needs the user and what it leaves for the next operation.
- Starting information
- Camera streams, zone and equipment policies
- Human decision
- Site supervisor event decision
- Resulting structure
- Alert candidates and site incident records
How do we assess its impact?
These are evaluation dimensions, not measured performance results. Comparisons use the same task types, data scope and human-review conditions.
- Repeated alerts
- False-alarm review
- Site-rule context
Related work
Related applications.
Interface conceptResearch area
Interface conceptPlanningVisual quality control
Gözcü
Planned visual quality inspection for production lines. Connects anomaly candidates with station, batch and image context for operator review and corrective work.
Explore the application
Interface conceptJoint researchAgriculture and field data
Nöbet
Research into traceable field data for soil, water and environmental workflows. Preserves location, method, source and validation context for specialist assessment.
Explore the applicationWork with us
Discuss your project with us.
Let’s assess your operations, data landscape and priorities together.